Importance of Public Perception towards an Ammonia Economy

A guest post by Andrea Mercado-Guati Rojo and Agustin Valera-Medina, Cardiff University, sharing the conclusions of Mercado-Guati Rojo’s unpublished Master of Science Thesis for her M.Sc Sustainable Energy & Environment, 2017.

During development of the technical aspects of any energy project, a social perspective needs to be considered. Public opinion is going to be a fundamental parameter to determine the role of renewables in the future, with decarbonisation meaning innovation towards a comprehensive plan that involves not only technology but also psychology and how these two can benefit from each other.

Ammonia (NH3) is perceived, by some, as the crucial element for the switch to green alternatives. With its current applications as a fertiliser and chemical compound combined with the knowledge and infrastructure already established, the interest in NH3 is increasing. Due to the versatility of this gas and its advantages over other zero-carbon fuels, the concept of an ammonia system has exceptional potential for the future. Furthermore, it represents an opportunity for developing countries already involved in ammonia production through agriculture.

Due to the importance of understanding public perception of ammonia, Cardiff University conducted a study focused on the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico, which currently presents high revenues in agriculture and depends on ammonia as a fertiliser. An analysis of stakeholder’s perception of ammonia was carried out to understand the different barriers and drivers of each established group (government, people involved with cattle animals, and general public) following the research question: “What are people’s initial responses when presented the idea of ammonia as an energy vector.”

The results revealed that while the Mexican government is not currently interested in an ammonia system due to the initial cost and the lack of development in other countries, general population and people in the livestock industry are keen to help in the advancement of these systems via investment on the concept. Currently, Mexico imports 65% of its ammonia from the United States. However, its low cost and the investment that would be required in new infrastructure make it almost impossible to change to local production from renewables. Surveyed people admitted that all the projects to obtain ammonia from clean sources were interesting. However, they were concerned not about the toxicity of the gas, but about the cost of introducing the technology into the local market. What would change their minds? A technology that offers the same price as natural gas but with better performance.

The study applied a multi-methodological approach with a sample of 50 questionnaires and 7 interviews to people in the Mexican Government and people involved with cattle animals. The surveys were based on the initial responses before and after providing information about ammonia.

Of the 76% of people with an initial negative perceptive about the gas, 96% changed their opinion after being presented with an infographic with technical information, proving that the main barrier with general population for a technology like ammonia is the lack of information.

Click to enlarge. Infographic with technical information about ammonia: Andrea Mercado-Guati Rojo, Cardiff University, 2017.

On the other hand, during the analysis of other barriers, it was clear that the negative perception revolves around the impression that ammonia is a “dangerous gas,” a main concern of the public. Interestingly, regions far from the grid and in farmlands showed a highly positive perception of the use of ammonia as energy vector, while urban areas were concerned about the smell of the gas. It is important to highlight that most of the people interviewed affirmed that they are willing to pass over the fear of using ammonia if the gas proves to be beneficial for the environment and proper health and safety systems are implemented.

This study presents this information as a first step towards the understanding of public perception surrounding the use of ammonia as energy vector. However, in order to draw definitive conclusions and be able to complete the research with a comparison between the UK and Mexico, the School of Psychology from Cardiff University will be conducting further studies to provide an extensive opportunity to examine potential deployment of ammonia projects in two different contexts. The project will examine similarities and differences, as well as their drivers.

A guest post by Andrea Mercado-Guati Rojo and Agustin Valera-Medina, Cardiff University, sharing the conclusions of Mercado-Guati Rojo’s unpublished Master of Science Thesis for her M.Sc Sustainable Energy & Environment, 2017.

3
Comment

avatar
3 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
3 Comment authors
Greg Vezina, Hydrofuel Inc.John HopmansJoe Beach Recent comment authors
newest oldest
Joe Beach
Guest

Thank you for this information, it is helpful for people who want to commercialize NH3 fuel, like me. Overall I like the infographic, but I would like to suggest some small changes: – NH3 is actually not toxic. Rather, it is corrosive when it mixes with water. This is an important distinction when it comes to dealing with accidental releases. It is more similar to acids and bases than it is to actual toxic compounds like cyanide and phosphine (and gasoline, which contains known carcinogens). – From an engineering and safety perspective, NH3’s distinctive odor should be moved from the… Read more »

John Hopmans
Guest
John Hopmans

I think it is not so relevant whether you ask Mexican farmers what they think of NH3 as energy vector. I think NH3 should play a role at a much higher level: the dispatchable source of energy that replaces the fossil fuels as dispatchable source of energy. In other words: make phone call and have it delivered. In December I was in Netherlands and during 4 weeks we had grey weather, short daylight and no wind. I think the daily Capacity Factors for wind and sun that month were very low and battery storage would only have helped for 4… Read more »

Greg Vezina, Hydrofuel Inc.
Guest

The answer to all three of your questions is YES. Indeed it is more economic and environmentally sound to use ammonia WITH fossil fuels or renewable energy to improve net efficiency and to reduce emissions. Although you cannot find this research on ammonia energy.org or the NH3 fuel association websites, this comprehensive analysis of the life cycle production and utilzation of all forms of energy and fuels proves this beyond any doubt. It was released at the 2017 NH3 fuel and AIChE conference, and dozens of peer reviewed scientific papers have been published by UIOT based upon it.. 498g: Comprehensive… Read more »